The
word intelligence describes something that is
real and that it varies from person to person
is as universal and ancient as any understanding
about the state of being human. Over the last
thirty years the concept of intelligence has
been a pariah in the world of ideas. Variation
in intelligence became the subject of productive
scientific debate in the last half of the
nineteenth century, stimulated by Darwin’s
theory of evolution which asserted the
transmission of inherited intelligence as a key
step in human evolution. Galton seized on this
idea and set out to demonstrate its relevance in
Britain. His efforts failed but others followed
where Galton had led. Binet created what is
purported to be the first ‘successful’ test of
intelligence. Education in the West Indies did
not escape these scientific influences and the
concept intelligence did inform the organisation
of schooling in the region with a view to produce
distinctive pedagogic identities. What was
consistent across the core and the periphery was
the view of intelligence as a singular capacity.
This unitary view of mind as a comprehensive and
coherent entity is deeply entrenched in Western
thought from Plato and continuing through Descartes
and Kant. Traditionally intelligence is
conceptualised as a singular faculty which can be
brought to bear on any problem-solving situation
regardless of the domain. Intelligence is therefore
commonly considered a general ability that is found
in varying degrees in all individuals and is
central to performance in school. Although the
first intelligence tests developed by Alfred Binet
at the turn of the century were originally intended
to diagnose different degrees of mental retardation
these tools soon evolved into instruments which
purport to reliably predict successful performance
in schools.
However, Howard Gardner departs radically from this
conception of intelligence by defining intelligence
as the ability to solve problems or fashion novel
products that are valued in one or more cultural
settings. To identify an intelligence Gardner uses information from a multiplicity of sources. These
include knowledge about normal development and
development in gifted individuals; information about
the breakdown of cognitive capacities under
conditions of brain damage; studies of exceptional populations, including idiot savants, prodigies, and
autistic children; a plausible evolutionary history;
support from tasks in experimental psychology and
psychometric findings; and cross-cultural accounts
of cognition. Moreover, each intelligence must have
an identifiable core operation or set of operations
which can make sense of specific kinds of input.
An intelligence must also be susceptible to encoding
in a symbol system- a culturally contrived system of
meaning which captures and conveys important
information. Further, each intelligence is, at least
initially, based on a biological potential, which
then gets expressed as a result of the interplay of
genetic and environmental factors. From these
windows to the mind Gardner has constructed a
typography of nine intelligences.
His
work affirms the plurality of the human intellect.
Intelligence is therefore multiple. It must be
noted however that after infancy, intelligences are
never encountered in pure form. Rather they are
embedded in various symbol systems, such as
language; notational systems like maps, and musical
or mathematical notation; and fields of knowledge
like mechanical engineering. Intelligences are thus
biopsychological constructs: they constitute
cognitive resources by virtue of which an individual may effect a meaningful connection to a content area. Two of the most important implications of this work for Trinidad and Tobago are (1) the possible impact for ecological assessment of our abilities at all levels of the education system and (2) the use of jagged profiles of intelligences as a diagnostic and prescriptive tool. In the West Indies it is imperative that the curricular as well as the intentional, the structural, the pedagogical, and the evaluative dimensions of schooling take into account Gardner’s substantive insights into the nature of the mind as plural.
|